Read + Write + Report
Home | Start a blog | About Orble | FAQ | Sites | Writers | Advertise | My Orble | Login
 
By Glen Atwell and Shaun Inguanzo

Super Mario Kart (Review)

December 17th 2006 19:17
Title Screen


Players: 1-2
Genre: Racing
Developer: Nintendo
Platform: SNES
Year: 1992 (USA), 1993 (PAL)

Man do I remember sucking at this game... Also, I think I'm just going to modify/remove review fields now since some of this stuff really doesn't apply to games outside the RPG genre. Having no fields is better than having cluttered ones I figure.


Super Mario Kart is a racing game featuring 8 playable Nintendo characters: Mario, Luigi, Princess Toadstool, Yoshi, Toad, Bowser, Donkey Kong Junior and a Koopa Trooper.

There's a single player mode where you can compete in up to 4 different "cups" as well as a time attack mode. There are also 3 different multiplayer modes: Mario Kart GP (which is like the regular cup mode, but with two players), Match Race (where it's 1-on-1 racing) and lastly, Battle Mode (where you battle against each other in specially designed stages. There are three balloons surrounding each player's character, and the one who pops all three balloons wins. You accomplish this by using Koopa shells or banana peels to attack them).

Mario Kart GP



The graphics are what you'd expect from Nintendo: bright, crisp and colourful. The music is also what you'd expect from Mario. As for replaying the game, there's very little in single player since it's the same all the time but different difficulties. However, like a lot of Nintendo's games, it shines in replay value if you've people to play with.

Score: 7/10
152
Vote
Add To: del.icio.us Digg Furl Spurl.net StumbleUpon Yahoo


   
Subscribe to this blog 


Just this blog This blog and DailyOrble (recommended)

   

   

   


Comments
25 Comments. [ Add A Comment ]

Comment by Justin

December 17th 2006 22:02
Again, I can't believe the paltry 7/10 you're giving Super Mario Kart?! It - like Zelda - was a total classic for the system and the time which spawned countless clones and consumed many hours of enjoyable times.

There's 3 if not 4 cups the single player can race for, the battle mode has a long replay value, having friends (or a father) to race against was one of the most addictive features of console gaming. Plus, you could play as 8 characters, albeit with 4 classes and 2 of each class.
Couple this with the Zelda review and I'm shocked by your vicious scoring system this morning. I'm going to have to have a lie down again...

Comment by Nina

December 17th 2006 22:14
I still have this game! It's fun to break it out every so often.

Comment by The Daily Sonnet

December 18th 2006 01:02
I played a lot of a more advanced version of Super Mario Kart a few years ago, and I wasn't very good but it was a lot of fun.

Comment by Ahmed

December 18th 2006 02:34
I'd give super mario kart a 9.8/10, best racing game ever, I have heard that the DS version of it is even better but I'll believe that when/if I play it cos really, BEST RACING GAME EVER!

Comment by Always Eighteen

December 18th 2006 04:14
I love that game....


ah... Memory lane...

Comment by Cibbuano

December 18th 2006 05:33
I think that Sword Serenity didn't have the same experience with it that I did. Before I could legally go to the bars, we'd go to someone's place, eat pizza and drink soda and play Mario Kart!

It was great fun, but there was always the one guy that was much, much better than everyone else..

Comment by Ahmed

December 18th 2006 08:56
yeah, mario kart was probably the first social game I played with my friends, *sigh* going nuts over weapons and racing, playing as 'teams' then double crossing your temamate seconds before the finish line and claiming it was an accident, or that he shouldn't have been in the way )("IT WAS A BLOODY RED SHELL! YOU DONT FIRE RED SHELLS AND MISS YOU KNOW!)...

Comment by Sword Serenity

December 18th 2006 09:30
Justin,

Please read the entire review instead of just going off the overall score, since I included pretty much everything you said in this paragraph:

"There's 3 if not 4 cups the single player can race for, the battle mode has a long replay value, having friends (or a father) to race against was one of the most addictive features of console gaming. Plus, you could play as 8 characters, albeit with 4 classes and 2 of each class."

Here are the lines again:

"Super Mario Kart is a racing game featuring 8 playable Nintendo characters: Mario, Luigi, Princess Toadstool, Yoshi, Toad, Bowser, Donkey Kong Junior and a Koopa Trooper."

"There's a single player mode where you can compete in up to 4 different "cups" as well as a time attack mode."

"However, like a lot of Nintendo's games, it shines in replay value if you've people to play with."

I don't really understand your argument when it consists of what I've noted already.

Also, not everyone in the world will consider Mario the greatest game. That goes for any game. You may think a game is a complete waste of time while someone else considers it their favourite game of all time. And of course vice versa. Our gaming preferences differ. Is that a crime?


Ahmed: I'd have to agree with you on it probably being one of the most enjoyable racing games I've played. I'm not too fond of the genre, but I rather enjoyed playing the versus mode and piling red shells into my opponent. Well, and the track too.


Cibbuano: Actually, I had a similar experience since I didn't own the game. Back when I played Mario Kart a fair bit I used to go over a family friend's place every Sunday. So I almost always played it co-op. It's nowhere near as fun without friends playing though, which is why I never bought it for myself (as I rarely got the chance to play games with other people after that guy and one other girl moved away from town for some years). I tend to favour long-lasting single-player because of this.

Comment by Ahmed

December 18th 2006 09:36
I still think it's blasphemy giving that game anything less than a 9.5/10...

Anyway, Super Mario should technically be thought of as the best game of all time, not because of opinoins, just looking at it objectively it makes sense for it to be that...

Comment by Sword Serenity

December 18th 2006 09:42
Objectively, maybe. But reviews aren't objective, are they?

I'm pretty sure I mentioned when I first started up this blog that my preferred genres are RPGs and fighting games. Racing games and Sports games are probably my least liked genres.

So a 7 is pretty good coming from me in this case since I'd rate most other racing games that I've played a 5 or below.

Comment by Stanley

December 18th 2006 09:42
oh man i used to play this game obsessively when i was a little'un and challenging friends was the ultimate pleasure when i beat them.

i am having flashbacks now.

Comment by Ahmed

December 18th 2006 09:47
Good reviews are objective, doesn't mean some reviews lack fairness for the right reasons...

Comment by Sword Serenity

December 18th 2006 10:02
I'd have to disagree with that one.

I find good reviews are those where you can see where the reviewer's opinions are coming from. I'd consider a bad review being if I just said "this game is great" or "this game sucks, don't get it" without saying why I thought that way.

Anything that involves personal opinion is subjective. If a game were to be 'reviewed' objectively, it'd have to involve pure stats and no personal opinion at all. Ie, "You can have more than 1 player, you can do this in the game, you can't do this in the game, this game sold 1000 units in this country".

So... You wouldn't be able to say, "This mini-game was fun", "the controls were awkward", "it's fun to play with friends", "the characters were interesting" and so forth since they're all disputable and not facts that objective writing requires.

It'd be pretty damn boring and pointless writing reviews if I could only tell you the technical capabilities and sales figures of the games.

Keep in mind that I haven't told any of you that you're wrong for thinking Mario Kart is awesome -- because it isn't wrong to think differently, obviously. However a few of you have told me that I'm wrong for disagreeing wtih your opinion, for not having as much fun as you did on this game.

Funny how that works.

Comment by Ahmed

December 18th 2006 10:13
You could compare, and benchmark,a lso take into acount what the majority of readers would be wanting, you could say 'the graphics in this game are subpar' and it wouldn't be an opinion, it would be objective facts, and the majority of people would agree.

You could say 'such and such minigame was best because it controlled better than other games, it had more polish and neater graphics', you give valid objective reasons for what you would think the majrority think so.

Comment by Sword Serenity

December 18th 2006 10:21
"You could say 'such and such minigame was best because it controlled better than other games, it had more polish and neater graphics'"

And that is what I aim to do.

"for what you would think the majrority think so."

No.

I am not here to suck up to the "majority".

If I were here for the money I would rate every popular game a 10/10 so that the majority of people would be happy that someone else thinks the same way they do.

But I'm not.

Comment by Ahmed

December 18th 2006 10:25
THats not how it works, 'KillZone' on the ps2 was an extremely popular game but it got a mediocre 7.5/10 on IGN, the majority of people who like it for gameplay, not for hype.

Comment by Sword Serenity

December 18th 2006 10:41
The main review on KillZone at IGN is written by Ivan Sulic -- one person.

I can say that I don't use IGN much, since I'm not sure whether that figure on his review is the mean of all the user submitted reviews, or his own figures. Regardless, there are plenty of user reviews on the site: http://readerreviews.ign.com/rrobj/game/index/568333

Some people rated it a 10/10, some rated it pretty close to the other end. Nothing unusual. All individual reviews too.

So tell me, what makes you think I'm trying to speak for the majority?

I am one person, and speaking for one person's opinion of a game. Wanting me assume others think a certain way or to speak for a majority is pretty stupid and pretentious.

I'd also consider anyone using my review alone to decide whether to buy a game pretty stupid. Just because I like a game doesn't mean you will. If a buyer's checking someone's review before buying a game, it's pretty much guaranteed that they'd check multiple people's reviews to get different opinions about what they liked and disliked about them.

Comment by Ahmed

December 18th 2006 10:45
erm, yes it was, whats your point?

You see, Ivan Sulivic is a professional writer, he knows what he's doing and he's held accountable to what he writes unlike 'KillZone_roxorz_3000', so he reviews games objectively, very objectively. Actually the KillZone review is an excellent example of impartial reviewing, Ivan mentions that the game has gotten a lot of hype but it did not sway the review one way or the other, and it generall holds up.

If IGN was in fact for instance reviewing games without objectivity then there would be plenty of 10/10's by the writers, but they are held accountable to what they do put online hence they do their best to not let personal opinoin get in the way. I mean, sure it does, but not to too high a degree.

That is the whole point of being impartial.

Comment by Sword Serenity

December 18th 2006 10:49
I thought you would have figured out by now that I'm not a professional writer.

Comment by Ahmed

December 18th 2006 10:52
True, sorry, this post didn't get that point across: "Good reviews are objective, doesn't mean some reviews lack fairness for the right reasons..."

Anyway, gah, forget it, this is one of those 'we agree, but we just want to argue' kind of things that happens on the internet...

Comment by Sword Serenity

December 18th 2006 10:58
Something like that.

Just take my reviews with a grain of salt like anyone elses is all I'm trying to say, since I view myself as just another nobody on the internet who likes talking about games.

I'll warn you now that there are some more "closer-to-average" (5/10 is average for me, not 7.5) reviews coming up on some platformer games that other people have enjoyed over the years. It's "sameness" that really bores me with games.

Though I can say that there IS one Mario game coming up in review queue that I really quite enjoyed.

Comment by Ahmed

December 18th 2006 11:00

Comment by Sword Serenity

December 18th 2006 11:03
Yep. Surprisingly it was pretty good despite the story/character depth element. I honestly thought it'd suck when I first picked it up.

Comment by Ahmed

December 18th 2006 11:05

Comment by Sword Serenity

December 18th 2006 11:12
Yeah. I'm not really a fan of Disney, but I found that the game was pretty good from what little I played of it during a rental.

I had some technical issues playing it though (very small hands don't go well with focused analogue stick play) but that's no real fault of the game. A shame really since I'd have liked to play that one through to finish and see how it went.

Add A Comment

To create a fully formatted comment please click here.


CLICK HERE TO LOGIN | CLICK HERE TO REGISTER

Name or Orble Tag
Home Page (optional)
Comments
Bold Italic Underline Strikethrough Separator Left Center Right Separator Quote Insert Link Insert Email
Notify me of replies
Notify extra people about this comment
Is this a private comment?
List the Email Addresses or Orble Tags of the people you would like to be notified about this comment


One per line max of 30

List the Email Addresses or Orble Tags of the people you would like to be notified about this private comment thread. Only the people in this list will be able to see or reply to your comment.


One per line max of 30

Your Name
(for the email going out to the above list, it can be different to your Orble Tag)
Your Email Address
(optional)
(required for reply notification)
Submit
More Posts
1 Posts
4 Posts
10 Posts
151 Posts dating from November 2006
Email Subscription
Receive e-mail notifications of new posts on this blog:
0
Moderated by Glen Atwell
Copyright © 2006 2007 2008 On Topic Media PTY LTD. All Rights Reserved. Design by Vimu.com.
On Topic Media ZPages: Sydney |  Melbourne |  Brisbane |  London |  Birmingham |  Leeds     [ Advertise ] [ Contact Us ] [ Privacy Policy ]